Thursday, 13 May 2010
Ruined by Lynn Nottage – Almeida Theatre ****
Mama Nadi owns an out-of-town bar in the Democratic Public of Congo; her place, a ramshackle two-sided shack taking up the entire stage, is a welcoming and lively retreat from the civil war which is ripping the country apart beyond its doors. Then the professor pays a visit – he has something in his truck that he thinks Mama will be happy to pay good money for, not the usual cigarettes or lipstick, but female refugees. Mama takes the women in, not out of some altruistic impulse to ease their suffering, but rather to put them to work as prostitutes and hopefully generate some income. Life at Mama's is preferable to the alternative, a life lived ostracised from the community because of being 'ruined' as a result of sexual abuse and mutilation. Despite this, Mama's girls are more than hospitable, providing lap-dances for the visiting militia in the bar - a sanctuary from the warring factions outside.
Seemingly impervious to the suffering endured by her new wards, Mama puts them to work. Jenny Jules' Mama is charismatic, wilful and strong but her mercenary interest in her customers, and the rough diamond she has sequestered away, makes her seem cold and inhuman. For Mama, if something can't be measured on a set of scales it isn't worth anything. The menace that has been threatening at the door finally crosses the threshold and there is a palpable change in tone as soon as the second half of the play begins. Horrific violence is first reported by Salima who has been forcibly held as a slave, enduring rape and beatings for five months, and who returns to her village only to be shunned by her family and then beaten and chased away by her husband. The play reaches a climax with the intrusion of war into Mama's realm and the death of Salima who screams 'you won' fight your war on my body any more' as she plunges a knife into her pregnant belly. We learn a crucial thing about Mama at the end of the play – she too is 'ruined' and this explains why she has been so solicitous for Sophie's well-being even after she was found to be stealing from the money-box. The professor finally breaks down the emotional barriers Mama has shored up against her humiliation and she responds to his tender avowal of love.
I can't bring myself to be critical of this play because it was so immensely enjoyable. That's not to say it was faultless, just that it delivered a thought-provoking message in an entertaining and deeply moving way. If I were to be cynical, I might say that the play couldn't decide whether it was a comedy or a tragedy- the humorous elements were perhaps too frequent, the violence, when it came, was then too gratuitous and unrelenting. The love story, rushed in to provide a happy ending, was probably too trite and too unproblematic a conclusion to the deeply troubling series of events that preceded it. Countering this imperfection was an impressive exuberance and vitality; the acting was excellent and the story deeply affecting. The disparate elements came together not to produce a balanced or harmonious piece of theatre (after all, we have moved on from dusty Aristotelian notions of classical dramatic form), but rather to portray the messiness of life and the enduring strength of the human spirit in the face of inhuman brutality and unimaginable adversity.
Picture Source
Sunday, 2 May 2010
London Assurance by Dion Boucicault – National Theatre *****
A delightfully energetic farce, London Assurance is pure entertainment and, under Nicholas Hytner's direction, a joy from start to finish. Sir Harcourt Courtly, a sixty year-old fop, leaves London for a country estate in order to marry the young Grace, niece to Max Harkaway, who at eighteen and haughtily dismissive of love, has committed to marrying Courtly in order to retain her inheritance. Arriving separately and in disguise, Courtly's son, Charles, falls in love with Grace and, along with the hanger-on Dazzle, hatches a plan to divert his father's attention and gain Grace's hand in marriage. Enter Lady Gay Spanker, stealing the show with her exuberant gaiety and hilarious obsession with hunting, to ensnare Courtly and allow young love to flourish.
The conventional happy ending retains a pleasing bite as we realise that Grace's pairing with Charles is not a simple triumph of love over money and duty. Charles inherits the wealth promised to his father if Courtly doesn't marry Grace and so, by choosing Charles, she dodges the unsavoury poser for a younger model in this marriage market. The play is replete with references to the 'mercantile' ways of the world and, although written over 150 years ago, it raises many a knowingly ironic laugh – Dazzle owes numerous debts but assures his creditors that their money will be safer with him than in the Bank of England. Much hilarity ensues as a result of the town/country divide, with the rural dwellers perceiving the Londoners to be vain and vacuous, and the urbanites thinking the country-folk to be nothing more than ignorant hicks with an unnatural predilection for riding horses.
The real reason to go and see this production is not the quality of the play itself; although a neat and entertaining diversion, it would be nothing without a superb cast of comic actors. And here is a superb cast indeed which brings together Fiona Shaw as Lady Spanker and Simon Russell Beale as Courtly – both are outrageous and work so inimitably well together that they could carry the play by themselves. The real treat is that Shaw and Beale are the prize jewels in a glittering crown; the support from the likes of Nick Sampson as Cool and Richard Briers as Lady Spanker's downtrodden husband is first-class. I would be reluctant to see another production of this play in the future, I think we have the definitive version here and I urge you to see it. I doubt it will ever be this good again.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)